Senators Reach Compromise on ‘Boyfriend Loophole’—But Republicans Insist on Continuing Gun Exemptions for Abusers


Gun security advocates take part within the ‘March For Our Lives’ rally in downtown Orlando, Fla., on June 11, 2022 . Related marches have been held throughout the U.S. within the wake of the mass taking pictures at a grocery retailer in Buffalo, N.Y., on Could 14 which took 10 lives, and one other on Could 24 in Uvalde, Texas, wherein 19 college students and two lecturers have been killed. (Paul Hennessy / Anadolu Company through Getty Photographs)

On Tuesday evening, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators engaged on landmark bipartisan gun laws reached a compromise on the so-called “boyfriend loophole,” blocking courting companions convicted of a misdemeanor from shopping for weapons—however permitting them to regain the fitting to purchase a gun after 5 years supplied that they have been first-time offenders and never discovered responsible of another violent misdemeanor or offense.

“Whereas this isn’t the perfect or good invoice, this provision is a vital first step to closing the courting companion loophole,” stated Deborah Vagins, president and CEO of the Nationwide Community to Finish Home Violence. “Many beforehand unprotected victims will now have some security from gun violence. We look ahead to working with Congress to completely shut the dating partner loophole, together with extending the federal legislation to courting abusers topic to protecting orders.”

Lead Democrat negotiators Sens. Chris Murphy (Conn.) and Krysten Sinema (Ariz.) pushed for a broader prohibition however lead Republican negotiators Sens. John Cornyn (Texas) and Senator Thom Tillis (N.C.) insisted on narrowing the prohibition.

The availability is a part of the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which might prohibit weapons from getting within the palms of harmful individuals by incentivizing crimson flag legal guidelines, growing scrutiny for gun patrons below the age of 21 and funding psychological well being assets in colleges and communities. On Tuesday evening, the Senate voted 64-34 in favor of advancing the invoice. Fourteen Republicans joined all 50 Democrats to advancing the invoice.

Current legal guidelines prohibit firearms entry for abusers who’re convicted of misdemeanor home violence and for individuals who have home violence protecting orders in opposition to them, however solely applies to former spouses, present and former cohabitants, or individuals who have a baby in widespread. Present legislation excludes courting companions—referred to as the “boyfriend loophole.”

“There have been many makes an attempt to shut the boyfriend loophole. It’s a significant hole within the legislation that enables individuals who’ve been convicted of misdemeanor home violence in opposition to courting companions to maintain their weapons,” says Vagins. “Closing the boyfriend loophole is extremely vital as a way to defend survivors of home violence who’re in concern of their security.”

The proposed bipartisan invoice defines “courting relationship” to be a “relationship between people who’ve or have just lately had a unbroken severe relationship of a romantic or intimate nature” decided by the size and nature of the connection and the frequency and kind of interplay between the people concerned within the relationship. The statute exempts “an informal acquaintanceship or odd fraternization in a enterprise or social context.”

The compromise invoice applies to courting abusers with misdemeanor home violence convictions however to not these topic to protecting orders. Nor does it apply retroactively.

The invoice nonetheless treats courting companions in another way than present or former abusive spouses or cohabitants by giving abusive courting companions the fitting to regain entry to firearms after 5 years and permitting abusive courting companions topic to protecting orders to acquire weapons.

The invoice additionally permits convicted stalkers of ladies with whom they haven’t had earlier intimate relations to acquire weapons. One in three women expertise stalking sooner or later of their lives and 42 percent of stalkers are acquaintances of their victims, which means a earlier intimate relationship by no means existed.

Within the U.S., greater than one in three women have skilled rape, bodily violence and/or stalking by an intimate companion of their lifetime. A mean of three ladies are killed by a present or former intimate companion each single day. Almost half of all ladies killed within the U.S. are murdered by a present or former intimate companion, and about a million ladies have been shot or shot at by an intimate companion.

“In response to the Nationwide Coalition In opposition to Home Violence, 60 % of intimate companion homicides in 2020 have been dedicated by courting companions,” stated Vagins. “It’s a giant quantity and it’s a giant loophole that should be closed to guard victims.”

Totally closing the boyfriend loophole wouldn’t solely defend ladies in abusive relationships however may even defend others. Over two-thirds of mass shooters are home violence perpetrators. Research reveals sturdy hyperlinks between home violence and mass shootings. 

Final yr, the U.S. Home of Representatives passed the Violence Against Women Act of 2021 with a provision that may preserve firearms out of the palms of abusers by closing the boyfriend loophole, however Republicans blocked the supply within the ultimate model handed by the Senate. President Biden signed the Violence Against Women Act of 2022 in March of this yr. Whether or not the supply narrowing the boyfriend loophole will survive within the present laws stays to be seen.

The invoice will now advance to the complete Senate for a vote, probably by the tip of the week, after which Senate will ship the invoice to the Home.

“Closing the boyfriend loophole is lengthy overdue,” stated Vagins. “For yearly that goes by with out it being closed, extra courting companions are open to menace and security issues. We hope it is going to move Congress and urge people to let their representatives know the way vital that is to them.”

If you found this article helpful, please consider supporting our independent reporting and truth-telling for as little as $5 per month.

Up subsequent:


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here