Texas Abortion Funds File New Challenges to Abortion Ban: ‘We Will Not Be Intimidated’


Whereas no less than 10 states think about payments copying Texas S.B. 8., lawsuits filed final week by two Texas abortion funds present new hope for restoring abortion entry within the state.

A girl carries an indication declaring abortion part of healthcare at a rally on the Texas State Capitol on Sept. 11, 2021, in Austin. (Jordan Vonderhaar / Getty Pictures)

On March 16, the Texas Equal Access (TEA) Fund and the Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity filed complaints in opposition to two right-wing anti-abortion organizations: the America First Legal Foundation in a Washington D.C. federal courtroom and the Thomas More Society in an Illinois federal courtroom. Additionally they filed complaints in opposition to two people, Sadie Weldon and Ashley Maxwell, in two totally different Texas district courts. The lawsuits ask the courts to declare S.B. 8, the Texas six-week abortion ban, unconstitutional and to dam the defendants from imposing the legislation.

The U.S. Supreme Court docket and the Texas Supreme Court docket have beforehand dismissed abortion suppliers’ lawsuits difficult the constitutionality of S.B. 8, however these 4 lawsuits filed final week present new hope for restoring abortion entry within the state.

TEA Fund and Lilith Fund increase cash and assist low-income sufferers looking for abortion care in Texas and different states. The lawsuits got here after Weldon and Maxwell filed court petitions in opposition to the 2 funds in February looking for to query their leaders about how they’ve helped folks get hold of abortions since S.B. 8 went into impact. Weldon and Maxwell are represented by Jonathan Mitchell, the architect of S.B. 8 and a former solicitor normal for Texas; state Sen. Bryan Hughes (R), the legislation’s chief legislative advocate; and legal professionals from the Thomas Extra Society and America First Authorized Basis.

These assaults in opposition to our fund are supposed to stigmatize funding abortion and forestall us from supporting Texans looking for care.

Kamyon Conner, govt director of TEA Fund

On Twitter, Tom Brejcha, president and chief counsel of the Thomas Extra Society, accused Texas abortion funds of violating S.B. 8 throughout a two-day interval in October when a choose quickly blocked the ban. One other tweet claimed that individuals donating to the funds are topic to civil and felony lawsuits.

Of their criticism, the funds argue that the trouble to implement S.B. 8 “poses imminent and existential threats to the elemental and constitutional rights of Plaintiffs, their workers, their volunteers, and their donors.”

“These assaults in opposition to our fund are supposed to stigmatize funding abortion and forestall us from supporting Texans looking for care,” said Kamyon Conner, govt director of TEA Fund. “The work we do to assist folks entry abortion helps communities thrive. We is not going to be intimidated. We’ll proceed to face as much as the bullies who’ve launched this assault on our work, our rights and our communities.”

Because the ban first took impact on September 1, nearly 1,400 Texans have left the state every month and traveled to bordering states similar to Oklahoma and New Mexico, but additionally as far-off as Illinois, Washington, Ohio and Maryland. 

S.B. 8 bans abortion at roughly six weeks with no exceptions for rape or incest. The legislation authorizes personal events to sue healthcare suppliers who carry out prohibited abortions or anybody who “aids and abets” one other individual to acquire one. The legislation rewards profitable plaintiffs “no less than $10,000” plus legal professional charges and blocks defendants who prevail from getting their authorized charges reimbursed. By barring state officers from imposing the legislation, Texas lawmakers sought to bypass constitutional abortion rights assured by the 14th Modification, which solely applies to state motion not personal motion.

On March 3, the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court docket dominated that abortion suppliers can’t sue state officers to dam S.B. 8. The unanimous decision closed the slender pathway to problem the legislation left open by the U.S. Supreme Court docket final December after the Court docket dismissed a lot of the suppliers’ lawsuit in opposition to Texas. No less than 10 states at the moment are contemplating payments copying Texas S.B. 8.

Advocates hope for a greater end result within the new lawsuits. Whereas earlier lawsuits difficult S.B. 8 had been filed in Texas, which falls inside the notoriously anti-abortion fifth Circuit Court docket of Appeals, these information lawsuits are filed in Chicago and Washington, D.C., which fall inside the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the seventh Circuit and the District of Columbia, that are seen as more likely to be extra favorable to their arguments.

“We’re but once more being pressured to guard the work we do and present up for Texans who want abortions and the individuals who love them,” said Amanda Beatriz Williams, govt director of Lilith Fund. “We received’t be harassed or intimidated out of serving our neighborhood, within the courts or wherever else. We’re proud to struggle again, even when we’ve got no alternative.”

Sign and share Ms.’s relaunched “We Have Had Abortions” petition—whether or not you your self have had an abortion, or just stand in solidarity with those that have—to let the Supreme Court docket, Congress and the White Home know: We is not going to quit the precise to secure, authorized, accessible abortion.

If you found this article helpful, please consider supporting our independent reporting and truth-telling for as little as $5 per month.

Up subsequent:


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here